FBI whistleblower Steve Friend, in the wake of the attempt on Trump’s life, has sounded an alarm that goes beyond the immediate situation.
In a conversation with Jill Savage of “Blaze News Tonight,” he expressed concern about the potential implications of the FBI’s response and its impact on transparency and civil liberties.
Friend highlighted an exchange between deputy director Paul Abbate and Senator Ron Johnson, where the FBI’s desire to thoroughly investigate all angles, including the possibility of domestic terrorism or assassination, was discussed.
While this approach may seem reasonable to a layperson, Friend cautioned that designating an incident as a domestic terrorist investigation could lead to classification and restricted access to information.
This classification could limit transparency for the American public, as details may be withheld due to security clearance requirements.
Moreover, Friend raised concerns about Senator Lindsey Graham’s proposed solution to access encrypted communication apps used by potential perpetrators.
Graham emphasized the need for real-time access to such platforms in order to prevent future threats, but Friend warned that this approach could erode Fourth Amendment protections and infringe on privacy rights.
He emphasized that law enforcement should operate within established legal boundaries, relying on reasonable suspicion and probable cause rather than continuous monitoring without sufficient justification.
Friend’s apprehensions extend beyond specific incidents or individuals; he is troubled by broader implications for civil liberties and government trust.
He criticized the assumption that encryption tools will inevitably be used for illicit purposes and stressed that law enforcement should operate within legal constraints, maintaining a high burden of proof before infringing on privacy rights.
In essence, Friend cautioned against allowing legitimate concerns about national security or criminal activity to erode fundamental rights and legal safeguards.
He advocated for upholding principles such as transparency in investigations and respecting constitutional protections even in the face of evolving technological challenges.
As surveillance capabilities advance and encryption technologies become more prevalent, Friend’s warnings serve as a reminder of the delicate balance between security measures and individual freedoms.
ICYMI: Dad’s Writing 5 Years Ago Revealed Kamala as a Vicious, Petty Bully, Now Doc Has Resurfaced
